Friday, July 27, 2018

MCLB #3

What makes the workshop model an inclusive pedagogy?

Image result for inclusive pedagogy

Inclusive pedagogy has the definition in its name. All students benefit from a certain style of teaching. The pedagogy is that we teach to all learners by working their areas of improvements to become their strengths, without making the content simpler. The workshop model is an inclusive pedagogy because it is not a “one-size fits all” style of teaching. It encourages whole class instruction for a shorter period time, individual practice, and one-to-one conferencing with EVERY learner. Having the mini-lesson not only allows for the teacher to provide the content but to also make formative assessments as to which students are grasping the content and who may need more assistance. The individual practice allows for students to work on different activities at their own pace. The conferencing allows for the teacher to take time with one learners and to really work their needs or cater to their strengths. The workshop model is an inclusive pedagogy because it provides frequent, intensive support as students need, as Dudley, Marling, and Paugh write. In the workshop method, the teacher pushes all students in the way that they can be pushed to do so.
With the writing workshop, students are taught to write something purposeful, targeted at a wide-range of audiences. Dudley, Marling, and Paugh say that this is not a linear process. Students are allows to write out their ideas and edit their work as they see fit. Some students don’t necessarily need to brainstorm or prewrite. On the other hand, some students definitely need more individualization where the assignment is broken down into further components that aren’t as open-ended. It is depended on the student need. With reading workshop, the workshop method is the same, but now students are to focus on reading to their level, but also pushing their perceived limitations. The goal is to improve and not only pick the readings that they want to read but what will improve their skills. Again, the workshop method is inclusive because it doesn’t tell the teacher to take the students who are struggling and to merely simplify or cut out content. It tells the teacher how to work on their level and to give them the challenges appropriate for them. It includes all learners. Dudley, Marling, and Paugh talk about how Mr. Garcia really understood his students by using the workshop method. He knew that some students, during conference time, needed one-to-one read alouds to remove some of the decoding and to allow for her to work on reading comprehension. He also sets an example for his student, Melissa, by reading in a slowly and fluently because she usually reads in a more halting manner.

“Pivotal Pausing” is a strategy whereby teachers freeze a video at important moments in the lesson. This helps the teacher to prioritize important events in a lesson. Use this strategy to identify two pivotal moments that demonstrate Rick's ability (from the Teaching Channel video) to differentiate to meet the needs of all of the learners in his class.  For each moment:  record the time, describe why this moment is "pivotal" and how it is evidence of inclusive literacy.

Image result for learning

Pivotal pausing is very important when teaching students. It gives time to have the students take in a video in chunks and reflect upon moments as opposed to taking the entire video all at once. It also prioritizes important events in a lesson. I use this strategy when teaching math to my resource room kids. Firstly, they love the videos. It gave my students opportunities to hear someone else talk or to see a different perspective on a topic. But it also gave them the opportunity to talk about the video between my pauses. It helped them get to the point of the lesson when I opened with a video without my direct instruction. Rick says is that reading workshop is the most natural form of how we read; sitting and taking time with the book. So this video partially shows how he does that.
That being said, one of the first pivotal moments that demonstrates Rick’s ability to differentiate to meet the needs of all the learners in his class is at 1:47. This moment is pivotal for a lot of reasons. One, we can see that previous to this, Rick has already explained that we make theories about characters. He reads the book as an example to start a theory about the grandmother and her granddaughter are very close. But the most important part is that Rick pauses to explain the joke that the grandmother said because he wants the student to understand that the girl didn’t literally grow in one week. This could easily be missed my students who struggle with this kind of language. It is important that he explained it so that all the students can actually practice creating a theory about the characters. Every student is being taught to think for their own.
Image result for individualization
The second moment is when the students start to do their silent reading, or as Rick calls it, “buried in a book.” He says that this is important because in the workshop method, it allows for time for students to pick their own book at their own level and read to themselves. He describes it as his learners having a “war” going on in their heads so it really isn’t silent. Dudley, Marling, and Paugh write that the classroom should have inviting literature for all readers so that they are excited during this independent reading time. This is what they call “immersing the classroom in print.” Because of this, students are really used to what it is to read all of the time. That being said, during Rick’s lesson at 12:20, this is when he says that this is the time for him to conference with his learners. This is when he gives them individualized work to help them become better readers. All of the other students are still being productive. But sometimes, the one students needs that work to improve their skills. He understands his learners and he differentiates for them accordingly because of this time. He talks to one of his students about “Beezus and Ramona” because that student isn’t monitoring her reading well. Rick has her practice reading for her so that she can monitor her reading right in front of him so that she can comprehend better. This is at around 14:00. He asks her questions so that she can continue to comprehend her reading and explain when she isn’t sure and what she should do when she doesn’t know what to do. Rick pairs her with a friend who has high vocabulary skills so she can just ask quickly in a non-threatening way. It is very effective and he records all of his findings. Rick says that this is the best method for his teaching pedagogy because he feels that he is reaching all of his learners, which is the definition of inclusive literacy.
Explain how the workshop model could be used in conjunction with Lupiani-Farrell & Matthews' "multisensory approach to language-based comprehension instruction."
The workshop model can be used in conjunction with Lupiani-Farrell and Matthews’ “multisensory approach to language-based comprehension instruction” because it provides a space for the multiple means of representation and engagement. The multisensory approach uses various senses, auditory, visual, kinesthetic, etc., to reach students where work the best. For example, in the chapter about attaining vocabulary with a student named Billy, it is suggested that Billy had difficulties with decoding and articulation. Because of this to promote retrieval, they suggested that he visualize a situation that the word reminded him of because he needed to connect with the term on a personal level. This way, he would be better at saying and reading the word. Lupiani-Farrell and Matthews give a lot of examples on how to reach struggling readers through various methods and case studies. Right in the introduction the write that their goals are to gain higher levels of reading skills in students, have teacher learn classroom approaches to teaching these readers, and show teachers how to pick the right methods for their diverse readers. The multisensory approach is all about learning who the students are and that’s what Dudley, Marling, and Paugh prove when writing about the workshop model. By using the method, teachers, like Mr. Garcia, are better equipped with a class environment that encourages learning who the students are and how we, as teachers, can better improve their skills.
Image result for workshop model
I used to use the workshop method in my Math class and I’ve used it for 2nd grade learners in my reading resource room as well. The workshop method is useful in both the inclusive classroom as well as the resource room and it works in both content areas. In my Math class, I started with an Anticipatory set, went into a mini-lesson, allowed for some guided practice, and then let the students work independently on different activities. Either that, or they could work in stations that are created based on the lesson and based on difficulty. I don't think the students need to reach every station, because they work based on their own pace and based on if I'm conferencing with them. I would usually have the students try to finish all of the activities, but if students were thriving, I would let them go to the next level, and if the students were struggling, I always had extra work catered to them to help them practice those particular skills. It removes me directly instructing and puts me in a facilitator position where students can learn how to get over their struggles on their own and really make meaningful experience with the curriculum. I don’t have to directly tell them that it has to be meaningful. It is very different when doing it with 6th grade math students as opposed to with 2nd grade readers. The 2nd grade readers had a lot more time with me because it was just two students in the class. With the larger class, and with older students, the students were really getting the grasp of following the structure but also being autonomous with their learning choices. By giving them choices, they were much less reluctant to learn.

This video here is an example of the Math workshop method. It explains its importance as well as its usefulness. I find it very useful for my own teaching needs as well.

References
Images:

Text:
Dudley-Marling and Paugh (2009) Chapter 1
Lupiani-Farrell, M. & Matthews, F.M. (2010). Ready to Read: A Multisensory Approach to Language-

Videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyhY-SLf-38


Friday, July 20, 2018

MCLB #2

Image result for visual literacy
We as educators should care about visual literacy. As we learn throughout this course, it’s important that we realize that literacy is not just reading, writing, and/or speaking. How we achieve literacy can also vary depending on the learner. Multimodality is similar to multiple intelligences, or is an extension of it. Among other things, it is how we express ourselves through visual, written, spoken, tactile, and sensory means. I think literacy is how we gain information but also how we give it back based on our personal interests, experiences, prior knowledge, and opinions.  

Image result for multimodalityImage result for multiple intelligences


Pillars also says from the very beginning of her book that we learn in pictures. When we see a word, we see an image. What we really learn is how to distinguish these images and then attach them to language. Visual literacy is so important because it encourages students to think in pictures and to stay engage in whatever it is they are reading, writing, hearing, or experiencing. Take comic books and graphic novels, for example. Frey and Fisher say that these modes of literature help the struggling reader, motivate those who don’t really like to read, and challenge higher level readers. The images help students to attach the words that they read to images and scenarios and provides a richer experience for the reader. We should care about visual literacy because it provides a medium to help students to images the words that they read, hear, and experience and further provides a way to help students speak better. The more they understand, the better they can convey ideas.

Image result for readingImage result for motivation

It is difficult, however, to rely only on visual literacy. There is an aspect of imagination removed by providing images with every word all the time for the rest of a learner’s life. My opinion is that visual literacy is imperative to the young learner, but can also cause hindrances in creativity when students are asked to imagine what they are reading at a higher level. Visual literacy is important when incorporated into a curriculum strategically as an aid, rather than as a replacement for an entire curriculum. Otherwise, the “struggling readers” that Frey and Fisher talk about who already have a hard time with visualization won’t actually learn to do it for themselves when it comes to a time when they have to. Eventually they will have to. Visual literacy is not the cure-all way to have all students read well and want to read well. It is a fantastic tool to push students beyond their limitations. Frey and Fisher also say that the use of graphic novels are a launchpad to something much bigger, which I completely agree with. We have to be careful that the visual novels are used to engage students but not discourage them from reading more complex literature.


I used to work at a school district before my current position where the entire 6th grade curriculum encouraged visual literacy. In theory, I thought it was a beautiful idea. As most articles and videos say that visual literacy is the new way to get students to better as society continues to changes and develop. Urbanski says that this new visual world (in reference to selfies😁) is how people really express themselves, and it has been this way since intricate paintings and portraits were composed. However, at this school district, I soon noticed that every concept whether it was narrative, persuasive, mystery, grammar, was taught with a graphic novel, a movie, a picture book. There was no actual reading whether students would read from a black and white page and do real analysis or introspection. The school had apparently deemed it “too difficult” for 6th grade and that they would move to that in 7th grade. But the 7th grade curriculum went straight into writing essays and reading very heavy books like “Night” from Elie Wiesel. The 6th grade curriculum seemed to be what Frey and Fisher said was an “end” to fulfill the means when teachers decide that they can wholly incorporate graphic novels into their curriculum to make it “easier” for the learners at all times. Though it can be challenging for higher learners to read graphic novels, after a certain point, it removes the motivation to create an original image based on a written or spoken description.

Image result for teaching quotes

I think visual literacy is important. It has endless possibilities Without it, struggling learners will continue to struggle because there are so many things about teaching literacy that currently don’t work. It makes so much sense. But I think we have to be careful running head first into this wonderful pedagogy without understanding the balance of literacy. It isn’t just visual learning, as multiliteracies prove, as Cope and Kalantzis describes. We must give students access to all kinds of methods to attain literacy and how to practice them in order for them to realize their preferences. This link here is a short video on how a lot of people learn well visually, but it is really up to their preference. Most of all, I think that's what teaching is; passionately teaching young learners while continuing learning myself.

References:
Images:
- http://blog.visme.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/visual-literacy.gif
- http://rampages.us/cnjacksonspring2016univ200/wp-content/uploads/sites/14161/2016/01/Mulitimodality-Chart.png
- http://cdn.playbuzz.com/cdn/89f4291e-4267-49e2-b0eb-708f9677fbd1/678cab8d-ac8a-4277-8639-0263ca5279e3.png
- http://www2.palomar.edu/pages/reading/files/2015/09/keep-calm-and-love-reading-64.png
- https://www.hopetocope.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/motivation-depression-anxiety.jpg

Text:
- Frey & Fisher (2008) Chapter 2
Selfies - a visual analysis: Elizabeth Urbanski at TEDxNavesink
Pillars, W. (2015). Visual Note-Taking for Educators: A Teacher's Guide to Student Creativity. New York, NY: W. Norton & Company.
 Cope and Kalantzis (2009)

Video:
https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/46953/learning-styles-is-visual-learning-really-a-thing
 (Links to an external site.)

Friday, July 13, 2018

MCLB #1


When one is literate, it means that he or she is able to use a variety of tools to understand the world and convey his/her thoughts to the world. These tools could be anything from being able to read, write, and speak, but also being able to draw, sing, perform, and so on. It is any module that allows for your brain to take in the world and also give an opinion back. Being literate means being able to absorb information and contribute to any discourse through a variety of means. These variety of means can come from the strengths of students with different intelligences. As Collins says, literacy is no longer just one form of verbal/written expression. The expression can also be kinesthetic and visual. Language is complex, so must be its forms of expression. With its complexities, also come with complex difficulties for many learners with specific disabilities, as Lupiani-Farrell and Matthews say.

Ability and disability, as Collins says, is seen based on how learners interact with different activities in the classroom. Ability is what the students can do and disability is what the children are seemingly
unable to do on the first few attempts. By positioning students in certain environments can teachers
tell where weaknesses lie. However, by not providing enough avenues for expression can students of
different backgrounds and prior knowledge can hinder the debut of their abilities. This can then be seen
as disability.

A disability is a wall on different pathways of the brain. It can create blocks that make it more difficult
for someone with a disability to achieve literacy or understanding. However, that does not mean that
someone with a disability cannot achieve literacy or understanding of the world. It means that they, and
educators, have to think of more creative ways to get around the “wall”.

The way we currently teach literacy is not particularly helpful for those who need helping climbing over
the wall because literacy is taught linearly and cumulatively as a lesson to be learned and not necessary
as a skill to be acquired. Linearly means simply that you learn one skills about literacy in order to attain
the next based on what an instructor has showed you. The cumulative nature implies that a learner has to
understand the former before moving onto the latter. However, with a wall in place in the mind of a
student with disabilities, they need other methods to understand literacy. The difference between
acquiring skills and learning lessons is that acquisition is much more involved with retaining useful
information in a practical, skills-based experience. Meanwhile, learning is more involved with traditional
forms of instruction of straight retention and regurgitation of information in an abstract format. This is
what Paul Gee says in “A strange fact about not learning to read.” In addition, as Kluth &
Olcott-Chandler say, we have to presume competence within our students. We, as educators have to
believe that even those who present with disabilities are capable of acquiring skills. Competence in
literacy is difficult to acquire, particularly for young learner who already have many difficulties, whether
they are identified with disabilities or not. Already from this course, what I’ve noticed is an emphasis
made on multiple means of expression and engagement. As educators, it create equity in the classroom,
we must constantly learn and understand that there is more to literacy than what a student can write,
read, or say to others. It is most important for them to strengthen those skill sets, but also to allow for
learners to give what they can, as unique as it may be.



Readings:

Kluth & Olcott-Chandler (2007), Chapter 2

Lupiani-Farrell, M. & Matthews, F.M. (2010). Ready to Read: A Multisensory Approach
to Language

Collins (2011)

Gee (2014) Chapter 1: “A strange fact about not learning to read” from Situated
Language and Learning, pp.6-17